Insurance Q&A: “Is insurance higher on red cars?”
I think we’ve all heard this question at some point in our lives. And you’ve probably been told with certainty that red cars are more expensive to insure by some all-knowing individual.
I guess the thinking is that all the fast or “cool” cars are red. The Ferrari poster on my wall as a kid seemed to back up the statement.
But is it actually true? Do insurance companies charge a higher insurance premium for red cars?
What’s the Verdict on Red Cars?
The short answer is NO, red cars do not cost more to insure than other cars, all else being equal.
This is actually one of the most common insurance myths out there today.
Knowing the basics of how insurance companies determine premiums will shed some additional light on the subject, but we can tackle the rest here.
Put simply, insurance companies do not consider vehicle color as a rating factor. So it doesn’t matter if the car is silver, white, black, beige, or purple.
However, there are certain aspects of your vehicle, and you, the driver, which are taken into consideration when determining what you’re going to have to fork over for coverage.
How Your Vehicle Matters, Color Aside
What insurers are concerned with here are the make, model and year the vehicle was manufactured. These three unique identifiers make up what is referred to as a vehicle’s “symbol.”
Insurers use symbols for groups of similar vehicles as a means to make their rating structure easier.
In short, the higher your vehicle’s symbol, the higher the insurance premium, all else being equal.
For example, it is quite a bit more expensive to repair a Lexus than a Honda (parts, etc.). Therefore, you can expect to pay more to insure the Lexus. It’s simple math to the insurance company, not a penalty for driving a luxury vehicle.
The year your car was manufactured also comes into play when determining your rate. The older a vehicle is, the less it is worth and the less you can expect to pay to insure it for physical damage coverage.
In fact, there is a point where, if you can afford to purchase a new vehicle in the event yours is damaged in an accident, you may want to remove the physical damage coverage (which includes collision and comprehensive coverage) from your policy altogether.
For example, if your car is only worth $1,500, you may not want to cover it for physical damage, as the cost to insure it may be more than the cost to replace it.
Tip: Having both liability and physical damage coverage is referred to as full coverage auto insurance.
How You (the Driver) Matter
We’ve already discussed physical damage, but what about liability insurance? Well, color still has nothing to do with your final insurance premium, but the symbol, or make, model and year, are a factor here as well.
Unlike the physical damage coverage, which is based mostly on the car itself, liability insurance rating focuses on the driver of the vehicle.
The same car, a Mustang for example, driven by a 16 year old, would cost substantially more to insure for liability than if driven by a 55-year old. Much more so if we’re talking about a male teenager.
All that being said, some argue that most sports cars are red, and because sports cars are the most expensive cars to insure, insurance rates on red cars (mainly sports cars) are higher.
Oh, and red sports cars are often driven by “aggressive drivers,” so that makes them all the more expensive to insure, on average.
So if it is indeed more expensive to buy car insurance for a red car, it is only for indirect reasons.
And if you happen to drive a red car and are in need car insurance, don’t fret. You’re not going to get taken for a ride simply because your car is a certain color.
As always, it is recommended that you compare insurance quotes online or speak to a local independent insurance agent to ensure you’re getting the best insurance coverage at the lowest available rate.