Chinese Drywall Ruled an “Insurable Loss”
Chinese drywall ruled an insurable loss so homeowners will likely have a more difficult time convincing the courts to force their homeowner’s insurance company to pay for drywall claims. The idea here is that the companies who built the homes and any other property should be using materials that last. Unfortunately, it will be the consumers that pay for the new Chinese drywall ruling.
Free Insurance Comparison
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
|
Written by
Shuman Roy
|
|
Reviewed by
Joel Ohman
|
UPDATED: Jan 21, 2021
It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right coverage choices.
Advertiser Disclosure: We strive to help you make confident insurance decisions. Comparison shopping should be easy. We are not affiliated with any one insurance provider and cannot guarantee quotes from any single provider. Our insurance industry partnerships don’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own. To compare quotes from many different companies please enter your ZIP code on this page to use the free quote tool. The more quotes you compare, the more chances to save.
Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about life insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything life insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by life insurance experts.
Sounds like great news…right? Well, it depends on whether you’re the homeowner or the home builder.
A judge recently handed down a decision in Federal Court that basically states the losses associated with the Chinese drywall debacle can be classified as “sudden, accidental physical loss.”
This classification is very important in insurance circles, as insurance policies will typically only cover losses of this type (in contrast to losses that are not “sudden, accidental physical losses).”
If property damage occurs to insured property over a long period of time (long term water leak or simply deterioration), or was intentional (caused by the insured or by another party), an insurer will not cover it. Period.
In terms we can all understand, this means homeowners and builders may not have to “eat” all of the losses.
Instead, someone’s insurance company will likely be on the hook – exactly whose insurance company might get stuck with the tab is where it gets interesting.
Why This Isn’t Good For Homeowners
Even though the drywall damage is considered “insurable,” many homeowner’s insurance policies specifically exclude coverage for “faulty materials” used in construction or “corrosion damage,” which are certainly the causes of the damage.
The idea here is that the companies who built the homes (or any other property) should be using materials that last!
So homeowners will likely have a more difficult time convincing the courts to force their homeowner’s insurance company to pay for these insurance claims as a result of the ruling.
Remember, the ruling states this is an insurable loss, but because it’s insurable, the insurance policy is the contract that dictates coverage and payments…and it excludes this particular peril from coverage.
Hope for Home Builders
The companies that built these homes may benefit from the ruling because they have commercial general liability insurance policies to protect them against claims arising out of their completed operations.
Since it has been determined that this is an “insurable” loss, home builder’s insurance policies may have to respond to these claims.
Commercial liability policies don’t often contain the same exclusions as personal homeowner’s insurance policies, meaning there is likely coverage available for these claims…especially since homeowner’s insurance companies look to be off the hook on this one.